Ace the Maryland Psychology Law Challenge 2025 – Get Your Mind Set for Success!

Question: 1 / 400

Which of the following is true regarding the disclosure of medical records for emergencies?

They can be disclosed without patient consent

In emergency situations, the disclosure of medical records without patient consent is justified to ensure rapid and effective medical care. When a patient is incapacitated or unable to provide consent, healthcare providers may disclose relevant medical information to emergency responders or other medical personnel involved in the patient's care. This practice prioritizes the patient's immediate health needs over confidentiality, aligning with legal and ethical standards that allow for such exceptions in cases where obtaining consent may not be feasible or could delay treatment.

The other options do not accurately reflect the legal framework regarding medical record disclosure in emergencies. Patient consent being mandatory would hinder timely care, while only requiring verbal consent does not accommodate scenarios where patients are unconscious or unable to communicate. Notifying emergency contacts first could also delay essential medical intervention, which is not permissible in acute situations.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Patient consent is mandatory

Only verbal consent is needed

Emergency contacts must be notified first

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy